Css – 2 DIVs next to eachother without Float

css

DIV#1's content is an image and the content of DIV#2 is a input text field.

#1 {
  width: 48px;
  height: 48px;
}

#2 {
  height: 48px;
}

I don't want to use floats because then the image of #1 breaks layout upon zooming the page.
I tried it with a table but then I can't set margins and padding to them.
Also tried display: inline-block but then I can also not use padding/margin.

I use % sizing on my entire page with the exception of padding so it's all works with zoom and different resolutions.

Best Solution

Working DEMO

Make sure that container they are in has equivalent or more width than DIV's(combined) and use this CSS:

#1, #2 { display: inline-block }

Also you can't use numbers as ID's in <HTML5, so I have used a, b instead 1,2 in demo.

You should be able to use padding/margin with this example as long as container width is enough as shown in demo.

2015 update: the flexbox approach

There are two other answers briefly mentioning flexbox; however, that was more than two years ago, and they don't provide any examples. The specification for flexbox has definitely settled now.

Note: Though CSS Flexible Boxes Layout specification is at the Candidate Recommendation stage, not all browsers have implemented it. WebKit implementation must be prefixed with -webkit-; Internet Explorer implements an old version of the spec, prefixed with -ms-; Opera 12.10 implements the latest version of the spec, unprefixed. See the compatibility table on each property for an up-to-date compatibility status.

(taken from https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Flexible_boxes)

All major browsers and IE11+ support Flexbox. For IE 10 or older, you can use the FlexieJS shim.

To check current support you can also see here: http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox

Working example

With flexbox you can easily switch between any of your rows or columns either having fixed dimensions, content-sized dimensions or remaining-space dimensions. In my example I have set the header to snap to its content (as per the OPs question), I've added a footer to show how to add a fixed-height region and then set the content area to fill up the remaining space.

html,
body {
  height: 100%;
  margin: 0;
}

.box {
  display: flex;
  flex-flow: column;
  height: 100%;
}

.box .row {
  border: 1px dotted grey;
}

.box .row.header {
  flex: 0 1 auto;
  /* The above is shorthand for:
  flex-grow: 0,
  flex-shrink: 1,
  flex-basis: auto
  */
}

.box .row.content {
  flex: 1 1 auto;
}

.box .row.footer {
  flex: 0 1 40px;
}

<!-- Obviously, you could use HTML5 tags like `header`, `footer` and `section` -->

<div class="box">
  <div class="row header">
    <p><b>header</b>
      <br />
      <br />(sized to content)</p>
  </div>
  <div class="row content">
    <p>
      <b>content</b>
      (fills remaining space)
    </p>
  </div>
  <div class="row footer">
    <p><b>footer</b> (fixed height)</p>
  </div>
</div>

In the CSS above, the flex property shorthands the flex-grow, flex-shrink, and flex-basis properties to establish the flexibility of the flex items. Mozilla has a good introduction to the flexible boxes model.

Html – Make Iframe to fit 100% of container’s remaining height

Update in 2019

TL;DR: Today the best option is the last one in this answer - flexbox. Everything supports it nicely and has for years. Go for that and don't look back. The rest of this answer is left for historical reasons.

The trick is to understand what the 100% is taken of. Reading CSS specs can help you there.

To make a long story short - there is such a thing as "containing block" - which is not necessary the parent element. Simply said, it is the first element up the hierarchy that has position:relative or position:absolute. Or the body element itself if there is nothing else. So, when you say "width: 100%", it checks the width of the "containing block" and sets the width of your element to the same size. If there was something else there, then you might get contents of a "containing block" that are larger than itself (thus "overflowing").

Height works the same way. With one exception. You can't get height to 100% of the browser window. The very top level element, against which 100% can be calculated, is the body (or html? not sure) element, and that stretches just enough to contain its contents. Specifying height:100% on it will have no effect, because it has no "parent element" against which to measure 100%. Window itself doesn't count. ;)

To make something stretch exactly 100% of the window, you have two choices:

Use JavaScript

Don't use DOCTYPE. This is not a good practice, but it puts the browsers in "quirks mode", in which you can do height="100%" on elements and it will stretch them to the window size. Do note, that the rest of your page will probably have to be changed too to accommodate for the DOCTYPE changes.

Update: I'm not sure if I wasn't wrong already when I posted this, but this certainly is outdated now. Today you can do this in your stylesheet: html, body { height: 100% } and it will actually stretch to the whole of your viewport. Even with a DOCTYPE. min-height: 100% could also be useful, depending on your situation.

And I wouldn't advise anyone to make a quirks-mode document anymore either, because it causes way more headaches than solves them. Every browser has a different quirks-mode, so getting your page to look consistently across browsers becomes two orders of magnitude more difficult. Use a DOCTYPE. Always. Preferably the HTML5 one - <!DOCTYPE html>. It's easy to remember and works like a charm in all browsers, even the 10 years old ones.

The only exception is when you have to support something like IE5 or something. If you're there, then you're on your own anyway. Those ancient browsers are nothing like the browsers today, and little advice that is given here will help you with them. On the bright side, if you're there, you probably just have to support ONE kind of browser, which gets rid of the compatibility problems.

Good luck!

Update 2: Hey, it's been a long time! 6 years later, new options are on the scene. I just had a discussion in the comments below, here are more tricks for you that work in today's browsers.

Option 1 - absolute positioning. Nice and clean for when you know the precise height of the first part.

body, html {width: 100%; height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0}
.first-row {position: absolute;top: 0; left: 0; right: 0; height: 100px; background-color: lime;}
.second-row {position: absolute; top: 100px; left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; background-color: red }
.second-row iframe {display: block; width: 100%; height: 100%; border: none;}

<div class="first-row">
  <p>Some text</p>
  <p>And some more text</p>
</div>
<div class="second-row">
  <iframe src="https://jsfiddle.net/about"></iframe>
</div>

Some notes - the second-row container is needed because bottom: 0 and right: 0 doesn't work on iframes for some reason. Something to do with in being a "replaced" element. But width: 100% and height: 100% works just fine. display: block is needed because it's an inline element by default and whitespace starts creating weird overflows otherwise.

Option 2 - tables. Works when you don't know the height of the first part. You can use either actual <table> tags or do it the fancy way with display: table. I'll go for the latter because it seems to be in fashion these days.

body, html {width: 100%; height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0}
.row-container {display: table; empty-cells: show; border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 100%;}
.first-row {display: table-row; overflow: auto; background-color: lime;}
.second-row {display: table-row; height: 100%; background-color: red; overflow: hidden }
.second-row iframe {width: 100%; height: 100%; border: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; display: block;}

<div class="row-container">
  <div class="first-row">
    <p>Some text</p>
    <p>And some more text</p>
  </div>
  <div class="second-row">
    <iframe src="https://jsfiddle.net/about"></iframe>
  </div>
</div>

Some notes - the overflow: auto makes sure that the row always includes all of its contents. Otherwise floating elements can sometimes overflow. The height: 100% on the second row makes sure it expands as much as it can squeezing the first row as small as it gets.

Option 3 - flexbox. The cleanest one of them all, but with a less than stellar browser support. IE10 will need -ms- prefixes for the flexbox properties, and anything less will not support it at all.

body, html {width: 100%; height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0}
.row-container {display: flex; width: 100%; height: 100%; flex-direction: column; background-color: blue; overflow: hidden;}
.first-row {background-color: lime; }
.second-row { flex-grow: 1; border: none; margin: 0; padding: 0; }

<div class="row-container">
  <div class="first-row">
    <p>Some text</p>
    <p>And some more text</p>
  </div>
  <iframe src="https://jsfiddle.net/about" class="second-row"></iframe>
</div>

Some notes - the overflow: hidden is because the iframe still generates some sort of overflow even with display: block in this case. It isn't visible in the fullscreen view or the snippet editor, but the small preview window gets an extra scrollbar. No idea what that is, iframes are weird.

Best Solution

Related Solutions

Html – Make a div fill the height of the remaining screen space

2015 update: the flexbox approach

Working example

Html – Make Iframe to fit 100% of container’s remaining height

Update in 2019

Related Question