I am currently wondering what is the difference between the two. When I used both they seem to break the word if it is not fitting the container. But why did W3C made two ways to do it?
Css – the difference between “word-break: break-all” versus “word-wrap: break-word” in CSS
cssword-wrap
Related Solutions
display:none
means that the tag in question will not appear on the page at all (although you can still interact with it through the dom). There will be no space allocated for it between the other tags.
visibility:hidden
means that unlike display:none
, the tag is not visible, but space is allocated for it on the page. The tag is rendered, it just isn't seen on the page.
For example:
test | <span style="[style-tag-value]">Appropriate style in this tag</span> | test
Replacing [style-tag-value]
with display:none
results in:
test | | test
Replacing [style-tag-value]
with visibility:hidden
results in:
test | | test
Depending upon the design being produced, each of the below clearfix CSS solutions has its own benefits.
The clearfix does have useful applications but it has also been used as a hack. Before you use a clearfix perhaps these modern css solutions can be useful:
Modern Clearfix Solutions
Container with overflow: auto;
The simplest way to clear floated elements is using the style overflow: auto
on the containing element. This solution works in every modern browsers.
<div style="overflow: auto;">
<img
style="float: right;"
src="path/to/floated-element.png"
width="500"
height="500"
>
<p>Your content here…</p>
</div>
One downside, using certain combinations of margin and padding on the external element can cause scrollbars to appear but this can be solved by placing the margin and padding on another parent containing element.
Using ‘overflow: hidden’ is also a clearfix solution, but will not have scrollbars, however using hidden
will crop any content positioned outside of the containing element.
Note: The floated element is an img
tag in this example, but could be any html element.
Clearfix Reloaded
Thierry Koblentz on CSSMojo wrote: The very latest clearfix reloaded. He noted that by dropping support for oldIE, the solution can be simplified to one css statement. Additionally, using display: block
(instead of display: table
) allows margins to collapse properly when elements with clearfix are siblings.
.container::after {
content: "";
display: block;
clear: both;
}
This is the most modern version of the clearfix.
⋮
⋮
Older Clearfix Solutions
The below solutions are not necessary for modern browsers, but may be useful for targeting older browsers.
Note that these solutions rely upon browser bugs and therefore should be used only if none of the above solutions work for you.
They are listed roughly in chronological order.
"Beat That ClearFix", a clearfix for modern browsers
Thierry Koblentz' of CSS Mojo has pointed out that when targeting modern browsers, we can now drop the zoom
and ::before
property/values and simply use:
.container::after {
content: "";
display: table;
clear: both;
}
This solution does not support for IE 6/7 …on purpose!
Thierry also offers: "A word of caution: if you start a new project from scratch, go for it, but don’t swap this technique with the one you have now, because even though you do not support oldIE, your existing rules prevent collapsing margins."
Micro Clearfix
The most recent and globally adopted clearfix solution, the Micro Clearfix by Nicolas Gallagher.
Known support: Firefox 3.5+, Safari 4+, Chrome, Opera 9+, IE 6+
.container::before, .container::after {
content: "";
display: table;
}
.container::after {
clear: both;
}
.container {
zoom: 1;
}
Overflow Property
This basic method is preferred for the usual case, when positioned content will not show outside the bounds of the container.
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
- explains how to resolve common issues related to this technique, namely, setting width: 100%
on the container.
.container {
overflow: hidden;
display: inline-block;
display: block;
}
Rather than using the display
property to set "hasLayout" for IE, other properties can be used for triggering "hasLayout" for an element.
.container {
overflow: hidden;
zoom: 1;
display: block;
}
Another way to clear floats using the overflow
property is to use the underscore hack. IE will apply the values prefixed with the underscore, other browsers will not. The zoom
property triggers hasLayout in IE:
.container {
overflow: hidden;
_overflow: visible; /* for IE */
_zoom: 1; /* for IE */
}
While this works... it is not ideal to use hacks.
PIE: Easy Clearing Method
This older "Easy Clearing" method has the advantage of allowing positioned elements to hang outside the bounds of the container, at the expense of more tricky CSS.
This solution is quite old, but you can learn all about Easy Clearing on Position Is Everything: http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
Element using "clear" property
The quick and dirty solution (with some drawbacks) for when you’re quickly slapping something together:
<br style="clear: both" /> <!-- So dirty! -->
Drawbacks
- It's not responsive and thus may not provide the desired effect if layout styles change based upon media queries. A solution in pure CSS is more ideal.
- It adds html markup without necessarily adding any semantic value.
- It requires a inline definition and solution for each instance rather than a class reference to a single solution of a “clearfix” in the css and class references to it in the html.
- It makes code difficult to work with for others as they may have to write more hacks to work around it.
- In the future when you need/want to use another clearfix solution, you won't have to go back and remove every
<br style="clear: both" />
tag littered around the markup.
Related Topic
- Android – Auto Scale TextView Text to Fit within Bounds
- Css – What’s the difference between SCSS and Sass
- Css – the difference between Normalize.css and Reset CSS
- Css – the difference between “screen” and “only screen” in media queries
- Css – Font scaling based on width of container
- Javascript – Is it possible to apply CSS to half of a character
- Css – In CSS Flexbox, why are there no “justify-items” and “justify-self” properties
Best Answer
word-wrap: break-word
recently changed tooverflow-wrap: break-word
word-break: break-all
So if you have many fixed-size spans which get content dynamically, you might just prefer using
word-wrap: break-word
, as that way only the continuous words are broken in between, and in case it’s a sentence comprising many words, the spaces are adjusted to get intact words (no break within a word).And if it doesn’t matter, go for either.