Java – Future.get() and InterruptedException Asynchronous threading

asynchronousfuturejavamultithreadingtimeout

Im using asynchronous threading in my application WITH httpClient. I make a call using the Future Api like so

mStrResults = (String) rssFuture.get();

this call attempts to retrieve an html string returned from my Callable httpClient call() method.

What i want to do however is ensure that the get method does not wait too long while executing the call() method. Should i pass a timeout parameter when calling rssFuture.get() or is it ok to just surround with a InterruptedException catch block?

Also is there a default time which the asynchronous thread will wait before throwing an InterruptedException and if so can i set a custom value?

Best Solution

You should pass a timeout parameter when calling rssFuture.get() and catch the TimeoutException. An InterruptedException will only happen if the thread running the your call gets interrupted with the Thread.interrupt method or if you call the cancel(true) method in the Future obj.

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

There are several differences between HashMap and Hashtable in Java:

Hashtable is synchronized, whereas HashMap is not. This makes HashMap better for non-threaded applications, as unsynchronized Objects typically perform better than synchronized ones.
Hashtable does not allow null keys or values. HashMap allows one null key and any number of null values.
One of HashMap's subclasses is LinkedHashMap, so in the event that you'd want predictable iteration order (which is insertion order by default), you could easily swap out the HashMap for a LinkedHashMap. This wouldn't be as easy if you were using Hashtable.

Since synchronization is not an issue for you, I'd recommend HashMap. If synchronization becomes an issue, you may also look at ConcurrentHashMap.

Javascript – How to get jQuery to perform a synchronous, rather than asynchronous, Ajax request

From the jQuery documentation: you specify the asynchronous option to be false to get a synchronous Ajax request. Then your callback can set some data before your mother function proceeds.

Here's what your code would look like if changed as suggested:

beforecreate: function (node, targetNode, type, to) {
    jQuery.ajax({
        url: 'http://example.com/catalog/create/' + targetNode.id + '?name=' + encode(to.inp[0].value),
        success: function (result) {
            if (result.isOk == false) alert(result.message);
        },
        async: false
    });
}

Best Solution

Related Solutions

Java – What are the differences between a HashMap and a Hashtable in Java

Javascript – How to get jQuery to perform a synchronous, rather than asynchronous, Ajax request

Related Question