I am reading about generic methods from OracleDocGenericMethod. I am pretty confused about the comparison when it says when to use wild-card and when to use generic methods.
Quoting from the document.
interface Collection<E> { public boolean containsAll(Collection<?> c); public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends E> c); }
We could have used generic methods here instead:
interface Collection<E> { public <T> boolean containsAll(Collection<T> c); public <T extends E> boolean addAll(Collection<T> c); // Hey, type variables can have bounds too! }
[…]
This tells us that the type argument is being used for polymorphism;
its only effect is to allow a variety of actual argument types to be
used at different invocation sites. If that is the case, one should
use wildcards. Wildcards are designed to support flexible subtyping,
which is what we're trying to express here.
Don't we think wild card like (Collection<? extends E> c);
is also supporting kind of
polymorphism? Then why generic method usage is considered not good in this?
Continuing ahead, it states,
Generic methods allow type parameters to be used to express
dependencies among the types of one or more arguments to a method
and/or its return type. If there isn't such a dependency, a generic
method should not be used.
What does this mean?
They have presented the example
class Collections { public static <T> void copy(List<T> dest, List<? extends T> src) { ... }
[…]
We could have written the signature for this method another way,
without using wildcards at all:class Collections { public static <T, S extends T> void copy(List<T> dest, List<S> src) { ... }
The document discourages the second declaration and promotes usage of first syntax? What's the difference between the first and second declaration? Both seems to be doing the same thing?
Can someone put light on this area.
Best Answer
There are certain places, where wildcards, and type parameters do the same thing. But there are also certain places, where you have to use type parameters.
Taking your method as example, suppose you want to ensure that the
src
anddest
list passed tocopy()
method should be of same parameterized type, you can do it with type parameters like so:Here, you are ensured that both
dest
andsrc
have same parameterized type forList
. So, it's safe to copy elements fromsrc
todest
.But, if you go on to change the method to use wildcard:
it won't work as expected. In 2nd case, you can pass
List<Integer>
andList<Float>
asdest
andsrc
. So, moving elements fromsrc
todest
wouldn't be type safe anymore. If you don't need such kind of relation, then you are free not to use type parameters at all.Some other difference between using wildcards and type parameters are:
Wildcards support both upper and lower bounds, type parameters just support upper bounds. So, if you want to define a method that takes a
List
of typeInteger
or it's super class, you can do:but you can't use type parameter:
References: