Scoping rules
The main difference is scoping rules. Variables declared by var
keyword are scoped to the immediate function body (hence the function scope) while let
variables are scoped to the immediate enclosing block denoted by { }
(hence the block scope).
function run() {
var foo = "Foo";
let bar = "Bar";
console.log(foo, bar); // Foo Bar
{
var moo = "Mooo"
let baz = "Bazz";
console.log(moo, baz); // Mooo Bazz
}
console.log(moo); // Mooo
console.log(baz); // ReferenceError
}
run();
The reason why let
keyword was introduced to the language was function scope is confusing and was one of the main sources of bugs in JavaScript.
Take a look at this example from another stackoverflow question:
var funcs = [];
// let's create 3 functions
for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
// and store them in funcs
funcs[i] = function() {
// each should log its value.
console.log("My value: " + i);
};
}
for (var j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
// and now let's run each one to see
funcs[j]();
}
My value: 3
was output to console each time funcs[j]();
was invoked since anonymous functions were bound to the same variable.
People had to create immediately invoked functions to capture correct values from the loops but that was also hairy.
Hoisting
While variables declared with var
keyword are hoisted (initialized with undefined
before the code is run) which means they are accessible in their enclosing scope even before they are declared:
function run() {
console.log(foo); // undefined
var foo = "Foo";
console.log(foo); // Foo
}
run();
let
variables are not initialized until their definition is evaluated. Accessing them before the initialization results in a ReferenceError
. The variable is said to be in "temporal dead zone" from the start of the block until the initialization is processed.
function checkHoisting() {
console.log(foo); // ReferenceError
let foo = "Foo";
console.log(foo); // Foo
}
checkHoisting();
Creating global object property
At the top level, let
, unlike var
, does not create a property on the global object:
var foo = "Foo"; // globally scoped
let bar = "Bar"; // not allowed to be globally scoped
console.log(window.foo); // Foo
console.log(window.bar); // undefined
Redeclaration
In strict mode, var
will let you re-declare the same variable in the same scope while let
raises a SyntaxError.
'use strict';
var foo = "foo1";
var foo = "foo2"; // No problem, 'foo1' is replaced with 'foo2'.
let bar = "bar1";
let bar = "bar2"; // SyntaxError: Identifier 'bar' has already been declared
This article about Javascript Strict Mode might interest you: John Resig - ECMAScript 5 Strict Mode, JSON, and More
To quote some interesting parts:
Strict Mode is a new feature in ECMAScript 5 that allows you to place a program, or a function, in a "strict" operating context. This strict context prevents certain actions from being taken and throws more exceptions.
And:
Strict mode helps out in a couple ways:
- It catches some common coding bloopers, throwing exceptions.
- It prevents, or throws errors, when relatively "unsafe" actions are taken (such as gaining access to the global object).
- It disables features that are confusing or poorly thought out.
Also note you can apply "strict mode" to the whole file... Or you can use it only for a specific function (still quoting from John Resig's article):
// Non-strict code...
(function(){
"use strict";
// Define your library strictly...
})();
// Non-strict code...
Which might be helpful if you have to mix old and new code ;-)
So, I suppose it's a bit like the "use strict"
you can use in Perl (hence the name?): it helps you make fewer errors, by detecting more things that could lead to breakages.
Strict mode is now supported by all major browsers.
Inside native ECMAScript modules (with import
and export
statements) and ES6 classes, strict mode is always enabled and cannot be disabled.
Best Answer
All package managers have many downsides. You just have to pick which you can live with.
History
npm started out managing node.js modules (that's why packages go into
node_modules
by default), but it works for the front-end too when combined with Browserify or webpack.Bower is created solely for the front-end and is optimized with that in mind.
Size of repo
npm is much, much larger than bower, including general purpose JavaScript (like
country-data
for country information orsorts
for sorting functions that is usable on the front end or the back end).Bower has a much smaller amount of packages.
Handling of styles etc
Bower includes styles etc.
npm is focused on JavaScript. Styles are either downloaded separately or required by something like
npm-sass
orsass-npm
.Dependency handling
The biggest difference is that npm does nested dependencies (but is flat by default) while Bower requires a flat dependency tree (puts the burden of dependency resolution on the user).
A nested dependency tree means that your dependencies can have their own dependencies which can have their own, and so on. This allows for two modules to require different versions of the same dependency and still work. Note since npm v3, the dependency tree will be flat by default (saving space) and only nest where needed, e.g., if two dependencies need their own version of Underscore.
Some projects use both: they use Bower for front-end packages and npm for developer tools like Yeoman, Grunt, Gulp, JSHint, CoffeeScript, etc.
Resources