R – simple method for checking whether a Ruby IO instance will block on read()

asynchronousiononblockingruby

I'm looking for a method in Ruby which is basically this:

io.ready_for_read?

I just want to check whether a given IO object (in my case, the result of a popen call) has output available, i.e. a follow up call io.read(1) will not block.

These are the two options I see, neither of which I like:

io.read_nonblock – too thin an abstraction of Unix read() — I don't want to deal with errno error handling.
io.select with timeout 0 — obfuscates the purpose of this simple operation.

Is there a better alternative that I have overlooked?

Best Solution

A bit late, but if you require 'io/wait', you can use ready? to verify that the IO can be read without blocking. Granted, depending upon how much you intend on reading (and how you plan to do it) your IO object may still block, but this should help. I'm not sure if this library is supported on all platforms, and I also don't know why this functionality was separated from the rest of the IO library. See more here: http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/io/wait/rdoc/

Related Solutions

Ruby – Is There a Better Way of Checking Nil or Length == 0 of a String in Ruby

When I'm not worried about performance, I'll often use this:

if my_string.to_s == ''
  # It's nil or empty
end

There are various variations, of course...

if my_string.to_s.strip.length == 0
  # It's nil, empty, or just whitespace
end

Ruby – invoke an instance method on a Ruby module without including it

I think the shortest way to do just throw-away single call (without altering existing modules or creating new ones) would be as follows:

Class.new.extend(UsefulThings).get_file

Best Solution

Related Solutions

Ruby – Is There a Better Way of Checking Nil or Length == 0 of a String in Ruby

Ruby – invoke an instance method on a Ruby module without including it

Related Question