Self-documenting code and can it replace well documented code?


I have a colleague who insists that his code doesn't need comments, it's "self documenting."

I've reviewed his code, and while it's clearer than code which I've seen others produce, I still disagree that self-documenting code is as complete and useful as well commented and documented code.

Help me understand his point of view.

  • What is self documenting code
  • Can it really replace well commented and documented code
  • Are there situations where it's better than well documented and commented code
  • Are there examples where code cannot possibly be self-documenting without comments

Maybe it's just my own limitations, but I don't see how it can be a good practice.

This is not meant to be an argument – please don't bring up reasons why well commented and documented code is high priority – there are many resources showing this, but they aren't convincing to my peer. I believe I need to more fully understand his perspective to convince him otherwise. Start a new question if you must, but don't argue here.

Wow, quick response! Please read all the existing answers and provide comments to answers rather than add new answers, unless your answer really is substantially different from every other answer in here.

Also, those of you who are arguing against self documenting code -this is primarily to help me understand the perspective (ie, positive aspects) of self-documenting code evangelists. I expect others will downvote you if you don't stay on topic.

Best Solution

Well, since this is about comments and code, let's look at some actual code. Compare this typical code:

float a, b, c; a=9.81; b=5; c= .5*a*(b^2);

To this self-documenting code, which shows what is being done:

const float gravitationalForce = 9.81;
float timeInSeconds = 5;
float displacement = (1 / 2) * gravitationalForce * (timeInSeconds ^ 2);

And then to this documented code, which better explains why it is being done:

/* compute displacement with Newton's equation x = vₒt + ½at² */
const float gravitationalForce = 9.81;
float timeInSeconds = 5;
float displacement = (1 / 2) * gravitationalForce * (timeInSeconds ^ 2);

And the final version of code as documentation with zero comments needed:

float computeDisplacement(float timeInSeconds) {
    const float gravitationalForce = 9.81;
    float displacement = (1 / 2) * gravitationalForce * (timeInSeconds ^ 2);
    return displacement;

Here's an example of a poor commenting style:

const float a = 9.81; //gravitational force
float b = 5; //time in seconds
float c = (1/2)*a*(b^2) //multiply the time and gravity together to get displacement.

In the last example, comments are used when variables should have been descriptively named instead, and the results of an operation are summarized when we can clearly see what the operation is. I would prefer the self-documented second example to this any day, and perhaps that is what your friend is talking about when he says self-documented code.

I would say that it depends on the context of what you are doing. To me, the self-documented code is probably sufficient in this case, but a comment detailing the methodology behind what is behind done (in this example, the equation) is also useful.

Related Question