SELECT owner, table_name
FROM dba_tables
This is assuming that you have access to the DBA_TABLES
data dictionary view. If you do not have those privileges but need them, you can request that the DBA explicitly grants you privileges on that table, or, that the DBA grants you the SELECT ANY DICTIONARY
privilege or the SELECT_CATALOG_ROLE
role (either of which would allow you to query any data dictionary table). Of course, you may want to exclude certain schemas like SYS
and SYSTEM
which have large numbers of Oracle tables that you probably don't care about.
Alternatively, if you do not have access to DBA_TABLES
, you can see all the tables that your account has access to through the ALL_TABLES
view:
SELECT owner, table_name
FROM all_tables
Although, that may be a subset of the tables available in the database (ALL_TABLES
shows you the information for all the tables that your user has been granted access to).
If you are only concerned with the tables that you own, not those that you have access to, you could use USER_TABLES
:
SELECT table_name
FROM user_tables
Since USER_TABLES
only has information about the tables that you own, it does not have an OWNER
column – the owner, by definition, is you.
Oracle also has a number of legacy data dictionary views-- TAB
, DICT
, TABS
, and CAT
for example-- that could be used. In general, I would not suggest using these legacy views unless you absolutely need to backport your scripts to Oracle 6. Oracle has not changed these views in a long time so they often have problems with newer types of objects. For example, the TAB
and CAT
views both show information about tables that are in the user's recycle bin while the [DBA|ALL|USER]_TABLES
views all filter those out. CAT
also shows information about materialized view logs with a TABLE_TYPE
of "TABLE" which is unlikely to be what you really want. DICT
combines tables and synonyms and doesn't tell you who owns the object.
Assuming three columns in the table: ID, NAME, ROLE
BAD: This will insert or replace all columns with new values for ID=1:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, name, role)
VALUES (1, 'John Foo', 'CEO');
BAD: This will insert or replace 2 of the columns... the NAME column will be set to NULL or the default value:
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, role)
VALUES (1, 'code monkey');
GOOD: Use SQLite On conflict clause
UPSERT support in SQLite! UPSERT syntax was added to SQLite with version 3.24.0!
UPSERT is a special syntax addition to INSERT that causes the INSERT to behave as an UPDATE or a no-op if the INSERT would violate a uniqueness constraint. UPSERT is not standard SQL. UPSERT in SQLite follows the syntax established by PostgreSQL.

GOOD but tedious: This will update 2 of the columns.
When ID=1 exists, the NAME will be unaffected.
When ID=1 does not exist, the name will be the default (NULL).
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, role, name)
VALUES ( 1,
'code monkey',
(SELECT name FROM Employee WHERE id = 1)
);
This will update 2 of the columns.
When ID=1 exists, the ROLE will be unaffected.
When ID=1 does not exist, the role will be set to 'Benchwarmer' instead of the default value.
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO Employee (id, name, role)
VALUES ( 1,
'Susan Bar',
COALESCE((SELECT role FROM Employee WHERE id = 1), 'Benchwarmer')
);
Best Solution
This trigger would do it:
I have assumed that the select from projects will always find a row; if not it will raise a NO_DATA_FOUND exception that you may need to handle.